go_gc_way
12-13 05:10 PM
Yes we are going to come back with vengence next year!
Are you all ready?
I 'm ready :-)
Are you all ready?
I 'm ready :-)
wallpaper If you need Cool Music Shapes
chanduy9
07-06 02:32 PM
i am thinking what causes ppl to send flowers and not join IV...strange isnt it..If they are affected by this mess why not join hands....join IV.....
I also seee people posting messaging that I am asking this question on behalf of my friend etc etc.....WHY DONT THOSE FRIENDS JOIN IV......
I soooo fail to understand this.....
There are lot people who dont know IV...I am sure lot of your friends also dont know about the IV.
I also seee people posting messaging that I am asking this question on behalf of my friend etc etc.....WHY DONT THOSE FRIENDS JOIN IV......
I soooo fail to understand this.....
There are lot people who dont know IV...I am sure lot of your friends also dont know about the IV.
for_gc
05-23 04:19 PM
This is what my lawyer wrote to me when I asked him if the May 21, 2007 date has any significance-
"At this point it is unclear what affect any pending legislation will have. My best guess is that whatever legislation is passed, if in fact any is passed, the legislation will only become "effective" at some future date, at least several months from now."
I agree strongly with this. Also, the application of effective dates maybe left to UCCIS's discretion e.g. LC substitution elimination final rule.
Although since this legislation affects issuance of actual visas (green cards), for example they have a cut off date for Z visas. That date is probably concrete. Or is it ?
I guess as of now it is.
If it takes years to really implement this new legislation I guess people with current PD's should be able to go ahead.
e.g if somebody filed I140 let us say today and his PD is current and he applies 485 before this bill becomes a law what happens then ?
"At this point it is unclear what affect any pending legislation will have. My best guess is that whatever legislation is passed, if in fact any is passed, the legislation will only become "effective" at some future date, at least several months from now."
I agree strongly with this. Also, the application of effective dates maybe left to UCCIS's discretion e.g. LC substitution elimination final rule.
Although since this legislation affects issuance of actual visas (green cards), for example they have a cut off date for Z visas. That date is probably concrete. Or is it ?
I guess as of now it is.
If it takes years to really implement this new legislation I guess people with current PD's should be able to go ahead.
e.g if somebody filed I140 let us say today and his PD is current and he applies 485 before this bill becomes a law what happens then ?
2011 Twitter: Cool Backgrounds:
aka
12-13 10:24 PM
A lot of the views expressed in this thread are those of people that support FAIR and numbersusa. Sad!
http://www.steinreport.com/archives/009849.html
http://www.steinreport.com/archives/009849.html
more...
GCBy3000
11-12 08:24 PM
Does it mean it is the end of CIR, SKIL, TALENT by the end of this year if nothing happens by Dec 31st.
So it is back to square one with SKIL bill too? Hmmmm this is annoying.
yes, to the best of my knowledge, bills that have not passed, die with the current congress. everything starts again, come january.
So it is back to square one with SKIL bill too? Hmmmm this is annoying.
yes, to the best of my knowledge, bills that have not passed, die with the current congress. everything starts again, come january.
gcformeornot
04-29 10:02 AM
Not necessarily, out of these 600k, maybe 100k are advanced degree holders, and out of these 100k, maybe only 30k can find an eligible 'American Employer'. I am sure when publishing the details they will exclude all Indian consulting firms. But yeah even 30k sounds a lot. I believe they will change that to PhD from 'advanced degree'.That will use a few thousands extra visa, which is entirely reasonable.
I agree. The Key point is Find a Job in their STEM area. Not like today where a MS in Civil Engg ends up doing job in IT consulting.....
an offer of employment from a United States employer in a field related to their degree.
I agree. The Key point is Find a Job in their STEM area. Not like today where a MS in Civil Engg ends up doing job in IT consulting.....
an offer of employment from a United States employer in a field related to their degree.
more...
nixstor
02-12 02:54 PM
As far as I understand it, it is a credit for your 2008 tax which is already paid in 2008
and not in 2009. But different from exemptions on a W-4, you don't have to return
this credit if you don't qualify next year. It is a real tax credit. In 2001 there
was not a credit but a change in the tax system and you could get an advance
rebate.
It's a free lunch if you measure it in Dollars you receive. In reality it is just
newly "printed" money. So the dollar will have less value (inflation) and a person
who doesn't get the "rebate" is cheated. The economy will collapse anyhow.
I am not sure if you are 100% correct or not. The language of the bill uses similar text to 2001 (as said on other websites) and the key word is advance refunds. Here is the relevant text if any one has some time to chew on. read the text in size 4. It tells me that it is going back to uncle sam. A double whammy if you owe taxes next year.
(f) Coordination With Advance Refunds of Credit-
`(1) IN GENERAL- The amount of credit which would (but for this paragraph) be allowable under this section shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the aggregate refunds and credits made or allowed to the taxpayer under subsection (g). Any failure to so reduce the credit shall be treated as arising out of a mathematical or clerical error and assessed according to section 6213(b)(1).
`(2) JOINT RETURNS- In the case of a refund or credit made or allowed under subsection (g) with respect to a joint return, half of such refund or credit shall be treated as having been made or allowed to each individual filing such return.
`(g) Advance Refunds and Credits-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Each individual who was an eligible individual for such individual's first taxable year beginning in 2007 shall be treated as having made a payment against the tax imposed by chapter 1 for such first taxable year in an amount equal to the advance refund amount for such taxable year.
`(2) ADVANCE REFUND AMOUNT- For purposes of paragraph (1), the advance refund amount is the amount that would have been allowed as a credit under this section for such first taxable year if this section (other than subsection (f) and this subsection) had applied to such taxable year.
`(3) TIMING OF PAYMENTS- The Secretary shall, subject to the provisions of this title, refund or credit any overpayment attributable to this section as rapidly as possible. No refund or credit shall be made or allowed under this subsection after December 31, 2008.
`(4) NO INTEREST- No interest shall be allowed on any overpayment attributable to this section
and not in 2009. But different from exemptions on a W-4, you don't have to return
this credit if you don't qualify next year. It is a real tax credit. In 2001 there
was not a credit but a change in the tax system and you could get an advance
rebate.
It's a free lunch if you measure it in Dollars you receive. In reality it is just
newly "printed" money. So the dollar will have less value (inflation) and a person
who doesn't get the "rebate" is cheated. The economy will collapse anyhow.
I am not sure if you are 100% correct or not. The language of the bill uses similar text to 2001 (as said on other websites) and the key word is advance refunds. Here is the relevant text if any one has some time to chew on. read the text in size 4. It tells me that it is going back to uncle sam. A double whammy if you owe taxes next year.
(f) Coordination With Advance Refunds of Credit-
`(1) IN GENERAL- The amount of credit which would (but for this paragraph) be allowable under this section shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the aggregate refunds and credits made or allowed to the taxpayer under subsection (g). Any failure to so reduce the credit shall be treated as arising out of a mathematical or clerical error and assessed according to section 6213(b)(1).
`(2) JOINT RETURNS- In the case of a refund or credit made or allowed under subsection (g) with respect to a joint return, half of such refund or credit shall be treated as having been made or allowed to each individual filing such return.
`(g) Advance Refunds and Credits-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Each individual who was an eligible individual for such individual's first taxable year beginning in 2007 shall be treated as having made a payment against the tax imposed by chapter 1 for such first taxable year in an amount equal to the advance refund amount for such taxable year.
`(2) ADVANCE REFUND AMOUNT- For purposes of paragraph (1), the advance refund amount is the amount that would have been allowed as a credit under this section for such first taxable year if this section (other than subsection (f) and this subsection) had applied to such taxable year.
`(3) TIMING OF PAYMENTS- The Secretary shall, subject to the provisions of this title, refund or credit any overpayment attributable to this section as rapidly as possible. No refund or credit shall be made or allowed under this subsection after December 31, 2008.
`(4) NO INTEREST- No interest shall be allowed on any overpayment attributable to this section
2010 cool backgrounds for twitter.
bigboy007
07-26 01:09 PM
I Don't think that they can return application back, that will be another lawsuit waiting to happen...but i am afraid that they might not process our application until new visa numbers are available again.
I LITERALLY ASKED HER 12 TIMES HOW CAN U RETURN IT , SHE SAID THAT WHAT IS THE UPDATE THEY HAVE FROM THE OFFICERS. FORGET ABOUT LAWSUIT ETC IF THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN WE ARE SCREWED BIG TIME
I LITERALLY ASKED HER 12 TIMES HOW CAN U RETURN IT , SHE SAID THAT WHAT IS THE UPDATE THEY HAVE FROM THE OFFICERS. FORGET ABOUT LAWSUIT ETC IF THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN WE ARE SCREWED BIG TIME
more...
kaushik07
01-09 03:08 PM
I found the publication. It was published by American Immigration Lawyer Association -AILA- on 11/26/07. Good look!
My Case Was Improperly Rejected By A Service Center � What Should I Do?
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 07112661 (posted Nov. 26, 2007)"
All submissions should include the original filing, original check, rejection notice, reason applicant feels rejection is incorrect, attached with a brightly colored sheet on the front for faster identification, and double wrapped with the inner envelope labeled: DO NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM.
Texas:
USCIS Texas Service Center
Attn: Morris Whitacre, ACD, Records/COTR
4141 N. St. Augustine Road
Dallas, TX 75227
Nebraska:
USCIS Nebraska Service Center
Attn: CRU
850 S Street
Lincoln, NE 68508
California:
USCIS California Service Center
Attn: CRU
24000 Avila Road, 2nd Floor
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Vermont:
USCIS Vermont Service Center
Attn: CRU
75 Lower Welden Street
St. Albans, VT 05479
If you continue to get rejections from Service Centers which you believe are improper, please scan the rejection notice and e-mail it to AILA's Liaison Department at requestedinfo@aila.org, Subject line: "Improper Rejection," and provide the following information:
� Attorney name and contact information
� Alien name, date and place of birth
� Service Center
� Case type(s)
� Reason for rejection
� Date of rejection(s)
The information provided to this e-mail address is not intended for specific case resolution - its purpose is for the Liaison Department to identify emerging negative trends or training issues within the Service Centers and attempt to resolve them through liaison channels.
Thanks for the information broadcaster. My attorney has send the information to Nebraska AILA Liaison. I will keep you posted if I hear anything.
My Case Was Improperly Rejected By A Service Center � What Should I Do?
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 07112661 (posted Nov. 26, 2007)"
All submissions should include the original filing, original check, rejection notice, reason applicant feels rejection is incorrect, attached with a brightly colored sheet on the front for faster identification, and double wrapped with the inner envelope labeled: DO NOT OPEN IN MAILROOM.
Texas:
USCIS Texas Service Center
Attn: Morris Whitacre, ACD, Records/COTR
4141 N. St. Augustine Road
Dallas, TX 75227
Nebraska:
USCIS Nebraska Service Center
Attn: CRU
850 S Street
Lincoln, NE 68508
California:
USCIS California Service Center
Attn: CRU
24000 Avila Road, 2nd Floor
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Vermont:
USCIS Vermont Service Center
Attn: CRU
75 Lower Welden Street
St. Albans, VT 05479
If you continue to get rejections from Service Centers which you believe are improper, please scan the rejection notice and e-mail it to AILA's Liaison Department at requestedinfo@aila.org, Subject line: "Improper Rejection," and provide the following information:
� Attorney name and contact information
� Alien name, date and place of birth
� Service Center
� Case type(s)
� Reason for rejection
� Date of rejection(s)
The information provided to this e-mail address is not intended for specific case resolution - its purpose is for the Liaison Department to identify emerging negative trends or training issues within the Service Centers and attempt to resolve them through liaison channels.
Thanks for the information broadcaster. My attorney has send the information to Nebraska AILA Liaison. I will keep you posted if I hear anything.
hair to use Twitter backgrounds
Unsung_Hero
01-07 03:38 PM
Sorry to hear about the problems that you had to endure at the POE. What the IO said was clearly wrong, and she had no right to put you on a watch list or threaten to endanger your Green Card.
But how did the IO come to know that you'd been on H1 till 3 days before you left the US?
For someone on 485-pending status, all that they need to provide the IO is their 485 receipt (or a copy of the same) and their AP document along with the passport. Nothing more and nothing less, unless they ask for something extra. If we voluntarily provide anymore information or documents right away even before they ask, we're just asking for trouble. They will comb through everything and try to find something wrong. The more documents we provide, the more chances they have for coming up with some dubious charge.
I guess she might have found out about the visa expiry through the H1-B visa stamp on your passport. If so, it's not really your fault.
But in general IMHO, it is better to provide only what is needed.
But how did the IO come to know that you'd been on H1 till 3 days before you left the US?
For someone on 485-pending status, all that they need to provide the IO is their 485 receipt (or a copy of the same) and their AP document along with the passport. Nothing more and nothing less, unless they ask for something extra. If we voluntarily provide anymore information or documents right away even before they ask, we're just asking for trouble. They will comb through everything and try to find something wrong. The more documents we provide, the more chances they have for coming up with some dubious charge.
I guess she might have found out about the visa expiry through the H1-B visa stamp on your passport. If so, it's not really your fault.
But in general IMHO, it is better to provide only what is needed.
more...
coolmanasip
07-26 01:12 PM
guys this is getting silly beyond comprehension........please please have some self respect........you did what you could and was in your hands......if after all this this stupid agency wants to return applications........do hell with them and do hell with this country..........comon guys don't be so desperate at someone's mercy..........u did what u had to.....else almighty help us all........
hot Best Free Twitter Backgrounds
rockstart
07-15 03:40 PM
What about all those guys who keep hopping jobs and not caring about GC when compared to guys who stick to one employer in hope of their GC? Now with your rule they qualify same time.
this is a extreme corner case to generalise. I have been eligible for EB2 since 1999...call it luck , i still dont have GC
this is a extreme corner case to generalise. I have been eligible for EB2 since 1999...call it luck , i still dont have GC
more...
house cool backgrounds for drawings.
zCool
01-24 04:16 PM
One of my friends went to DMV and made a lot of noise,
They have asked him to go personally with all the documents and they are going to try out exceptions process.
Meanwhile we have AG's office and SOS office clueless about folks whose lives they are playing with.
None of them even had a clue how many number of such people will be impacted , those who are legal, work full-time, permenant jobs with US companies but don't have Green card in hand yet!
They have asked him to go personally with all the documents and they are going to try out exceptions process.
Meanwhile we have AG's office and SOS office clueless about folks whose lives they are playing with.
None of them even had a clue how many number of such people will be impacted , those who are legal, work full-time, permenant jobs with US companies but don't have Green card in hand yet!
tattoo Twitter: Cool Backgrounds:
mrdelhiite
06-19 02:52 PM
it was planned for teh late this year,,, maybe a court marrige now and the full one later ... that is the idea
-M
-M
more...
pictures 2010 Cool Twitter Backgrounds 2 cool backgrounds for twitter.
Nikith77
05-20 08:49 AM
I applied on march 26th still waiting for the approval.
dresses cool girl angel
sircaustic
11-01 07:25 PM
This is the 'wife' - Before being denied it was on initial review. I'll call up tomorrow to find out what's going on. I doubt that i will get any answer from the CSR!
more...
makeup Purple Twitter Background by ~
hope2007
06-21 06:57 PM
Can anyone pls clarify what option should an EB based primary applicant check in Form I 485 Section 2--Application type. also i am filing for my wife who is on H4 so what option should be checked in her case.
Thanks in advance
Thanks in advance
girlfriend @tamij Twitter Profile
GCard_Dream
09-20 12:58 PM
Nope! I am trying to concentrate on my work....No way. I give it up.
I rather stay tuned........
30 hours is allowed for debate and it may just take 30 hours before we know one way or the other so guys just relax .. take a long breath .. browse internet .. go to lunch .. etc etc .. do whatever is necessary to keep yourself calm. :) .. just a suggestion. I am trying to do the same.
I rather stay tuned........
30 hours is allowed for debate and it may just take 30 hours before we know one way or the other so guys just relax .. take a long breath .. browse internet .. go to lunch .. etc etc .. do whatever is necessary to keep yourself calm. :) .. just a suggestion. I am trying to do the same.
hairstyles Download Dottay twitter
pappu
12-07 04:14 PM
Thank you for your patience. Access should be given in a day or two.
shaq
05-08 11:00 AM
I had no problem in clearing my labor and I-140. I have 3 yrs dip+3 yrs B. tech + US masters+ 2 yrs experience.
I am also on the same boat. Mine is 3 years Engg Diploma + 3 Years B.Tech+ M.Tech(Computers) and all are from India. I have 8 years of IT experience and working for well known company. My attorney
I am also on the same boat. Mine is 3 years Engg Diploma + 3 Years B.Tech+ M.Tech(Computers) and all are from India. I have 8 years of IT experience and working for well known company. My attorney
redcard
01-25 04:15 PM
Filled AP on 12/21 (paper filling) at TSC. Got approval emails today(1/25)
No comments:
Post a Comment