vdlrao
07-15 09:48 PM
Only three options:
1. Wait 'x' number of years (x = unknown)
2. Transfer EB3 to EB2 (keeping priority date) as most of us are eligible anyways.
3. Apply for Candian PR (atleast we get free medicare)
EB3 has a future but it needs some time. I know saying this to our friend who is waiting in the EB3 que for 7 years is a greatest frustration to him. :(
1. Wait 'x' number of years (x = unknown)
2. Transfer EB3 to EB2 (keeping priority date) as most of us are eligible anyways.
3. Apply for Candian PR (atleast we get free medicare)
EB3 has a future but it needs some time. I know saying this to our friend who is waiting in the EB3 que for 7 years is a greatest frustration to him. :(
wallpaper A high updo hairstyle done On
arunmohan
07-02 02:19 PM
Hello Guru:
I sent money to India in year 2008 more than 10,000$ for paying the loan of my house. Basically I never had 10,000$ at one time in the bank, it was always between 6-7K $. Do I still need to show to IRS?
Thanks in advance.
I sent money to India in year 2008 more than 10,000$ for paying the loan of my house. Basically I never had 10,000$ at one time in the bank, it was always between 6-7K $. Do I still need to show to IRS?
Thanks in advance.
bhobama
06-30 09:13 PM
"United States person" for tax purposes is anyone who has been in the US for > 183 days in the last year. If you are on H1B / L1 / EAD for >183 days you are a US person. In other words you filed 1040 and not 1040 NR
http://www.r2iclubforums.com/forums/f89/filing-treasury-form-tdf90-22-1-value-bank-accounts-over-10-000-outside-usa-1498/index2.html
I just googled and found this info...I am not sure abt this..
Nonresidents Needn’t File Foreign Bank Account Forms (For Now)
by phil on 2009/06/09
It brings to mind Emily Litella. “Never mind,” says the IRS.
The IRS just announced that — despite the changes to the FBAR instructions made effective January 1, 2009 — nonresidents do not have to file Form TD F 90-22.1. Only citizens, U.S. residents, and domestic entities need to do so.
Announcement 2009-51
Temporary Suspension of FBAR filing Requirements for Persons who are not Citizens, Residents, or Domestic Entities
June 5, 2009
The Internal Revenue Service is temporarily suspending the reporting requirement with respect to foreign bank accounts (Form TD F 90.22-1 (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) due on June 30, 2009, for those persons who are not citizens, residents, or domestic entities. The revised Form TD F 90.22-1 (October 2008) was issued with a change in the instructions to the definition of “United States person.” The IRS has received a number of questions and comments from the public concerning the new filing requirement that may require additional guidance.
To reduce the burden on the public with respect to FBARs due on June 30, 2009, all persons may rely on the definition of “United States person” found in the instructions for the prior version of the FBAR (the July 2000 version) to determine whether they have an obligation to file an FBAR. The definition of “United States person” from the prior version is as follows:
United States Person The term “United States person” means (1) a citizen or resident of the United States, (2) a domestic partnership, (3) a domestic corporation, or (4) a domestic estate or trust.
The definition of the term “United States person” from the instructions for the prior version of the FBAR form may be relied upon for purposes of determining who must file an FBAR. All other requirements of the current version of the FBAR form and instructions (revision October 2008) are still in effect. The current version of the form must be used when filing an FBAR.
The substitution of the definition of “United States person” from the instructions for the prior version of the FBAR applies only with respect to FBARs due on June 30, 2009. Additional guidance will be issued with respect to FBARs due in subsequent years.
The Service invites interested persons to submit comments regarding the revised FBAR form and instructions (revision October 2008). Please submit comments by August 31, 2009 to: Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA:LPD:PR (Announcement 2009-51), room 5203, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Submissions also may be hand delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (Announcement 2009-51), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit electronic comments directly to the IRS e-mail address: notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov (attention: Announcement 2009-51).
The principal author of this announcement is Adrienne Mikolashek of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). For further information regarding this announcement contact Adrienne Mikolashek at 202-622-4940 not a toll-free call).
What does this mean to you?
* If you are a nonresident of the United States and you were concerned about getting caught up in this new requirement, you have a temporary reprieve. You do not need to file Form TD F 90-22.1 at this time.
* Don’t go to sleep. The danger is not gone. It will be back for calendar year 2009 and future years. We just don’t know what the exact requirements will be.
* Look at the way you have configured your U.S. investments and U.S. business operations. Make changes now. This is an unexpected window of opportunity to restructure your affairs. Seize it.
Tagged as: FBAR, foreign bank accounts, TD F 90-22.1
http://www.r2iclubforums.com/forums/f89/filing-treasury-form-tdf90-22-1-value-bank-accounts-over-10-000-outside-usa-1498/index2.html
I just googled and found this info...I am not sure abt this..
Nonresidents Needn’t File Foreign Bank Account Forms (For Now)
by phil on 2009/06/09
It brings to mind Emily Litella. “Never mind,” says the IRS.
The IRS just announced that — despite the changes to the FBAR instructions made effective January 1, 2009 — nonresidents do not have to file Form TD F 90-22.1. Only citizens, U.S. residents, and domestic entities need to do so.
Announcement 2009-51
Temporary Suspension of FBAR filing Requirements for Persons who are not Citizens, Residents, or Domestic Entities
June 5, 2009
The Internal Revenue Service is temporarily suspending the reporting requirement with respect to foreign bank accounts (Form TD F 90.22-1 (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) due on June 30, 2009, for those persons who are not citizens, residents, or domestic entities. The revised Form TD F 90.22-1 (October 2008) was issued with a change in the instructions to the definition of “United States person.” The IRS has received a number of questions and comments from the public concerning the new filing requirement that may require additional guidance.
To reduce the burden on the public with respect to FBARs due on June 30, 2009, all persons may rely on the definition of “United States person” found in the instructions for the prior version of the FBAR (the July 2000 version) to determine whether they have an obligation to file an FBAR. The definition of “United States person” from the prior version is as follows:
United States Person The term “United States person” means (1) a citizen or resident of the United States, (2) a domestic partnership, (3) a domestic corporation, or (4) a domestic estate or trust.
The definition of the term “United States person” from the instructions for the prior version of the FBAR form may be relied upon for purposes of determining who must file an FBAR. All other requirements of the current version of the FBAR form and instructions (revision October 2008) are still in effect. The current version of the form must be used when filing an FBAR.
The substitution of the definition of “United States person” from the instructions for the prior version of the FBAR applies only with respect to FBARs due on June 30, 2009. Additional guidance will be issued with respect to FBARs due in subsequent years.
The Service invites interested persons to submit comments regarding the revised FBAR form and instructions (revision October 2008). Please submit comments by August 31, 2009 to: Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA:LPD:PR (Announcement 2009-51), room 5203, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Submissions also may be hand delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (Announcement 2009-51), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit electronic comments directly to the IRS e-mail address: notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov (attention: Announcement 2009-51).
The principal author of this announcement is Adrienne Mikolashek of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). For further information regarding this announcement contact Adrienne Mikolashek at 202-622-4940 not a toll-free call).
What does this mean to you?
* If you are a nonresident of the United States and you were concerned about getting caught up in this new requirement, you have a temporary reprieve. You do not need to file Form TD F 90-22.1 at this time.
* Don’t go to sleep. The danger is not gone. It will be back for calendar year 2009 and future years. We just don’t know what the exact requirements will be.
* Look at the way you have configured your U.S. investments and U.S. business operations. Make changes now. This is an unexpected window of opportunity to restructure your affairs. Seize it.
Tagged as: FBAR, foreign bank accounts, TD F 90-22.1
2011 Image bank of UPDO HAIRSTYLES
rameshk75
08-01 01:47 PM
Hey,
We just saw "Card production ordered" status change on our 485 applications.
So this proves that TSC is indeed processing 485 apps.
Our 485 apps were originally filed with TSC, then transferred to NSC in Dec 2007, again transferred back to TSC in Apr 2008.
Its been a long wait!! Hopefully we see a lot of approvals for people stuck in this for a while.
Thanks a lot IV, for all the support.
-----------------------------------------------------------
EB2-I
PD - May 2004
Service Center - TSC
I-485 - RD - Aug 7, 2007
I-485 - ND - Oct 2, 2007
Enjoy the freedom...
We just saw "Card production ordered" status change on our 485 applications.
So this proves that TSC is indeed processing 485 apps.
Our 485 apps were originally filed with TSC, then transferred to NSC in Dec 2007, again transferred back to TSC in Apr 2008.
Its been a long wait!! Hopefully we see a lot of approvals for people stuck in this for a while.
Thanks a lot IV, for all the support.
-----------------------------------------------------------
EB2-I
PD - May 2004
Service Center - TSC
I-485 - RD - Aug 7, 2007
I-485 - ND - Oct 2, 2007
Enjoy the freedom...
more...
imm_pro
07-20 02:50 PM
i am a contributing member;unale to login to new threads in Donor Forum.Pl Check.
Dear imm_pro,
We just wanted to let you know that your contribution has been confirmed.
Contribution date: 06-02-09, 07:28
Contribution amount: USD 50
We are very grateful for your support in building a stronger community.
Thanks again!
IV Team
Dear imm_pro,
We just wanted to let you know that your contribution has been confirmed.
Contribution date: 06-02-09, 07:28
Contribution amount: USD 50
We are very grateful for your support in building a stronger community.
Thanks again!
IV Team
VJDJ
07-02 03:54 PM
Example 2 on Page 10 is the one that most of us who have not renewed their H1 or other non-immigrant visa should be worried about. It clearly says that any non-immigrant who has not renewed his/her non-immigrant visa even though the AoS application was filed prior to expiry of the non-immigrant visa is subject to deportation. This I think is a serious cause of concern.
more...
prdgl
05-23 08:01 PM
I am not trying to downplay the gravity of this issue, but I don't think May 21st 2007 will have any significance even if this irrational piece of badly written legislation even becomes law. First and foremost no law can retroactively treat those who have followed the law before the new one is enacted. In most cases those applied before a law is enacted are treated in accordance with the old law or some kind of transition procedure. It is foolish for anyone to assume that people will plan on to file things based on when a legislation is introduced in Senate. Imagine the law suits that can be filed simply saying I was not made aware this provision when I was filing this petition and I am entitled to the full refund of the filing fees along with the associated damages. USCIS will be bankrupt in no time. That's why most lawyers are confident that such an insane thing even if it becomes law will some how be handled without retroactively treating the existing applications. In my opinions all those who have things at stake such as I-140/I-485 concurrent fillings or changing jobs to restart the process should be ok and there will be ample warnings when the real train wreck in imminent. Until then let's support IV and bring down the curtain on this stinky mess called retrogression.
BUt what I don't understand is why in the first place we think people after "cut-off" date are not good and before is good. If we figure that out I don't thin we really need to worry about "cut-off" dates.
Can anyone clarify please. Posting this 2nd time.
BUt what I don't understand is why in the first place we think people after "cut-off" date are not good and before is good. If we figure that out I don't thin we really need to worry about "cut-off" dates.
Can anyone clarify please. Posting this 2nd time.
2010 Jennifer Love Hewitt#39;s updo
qplearn
12-12 06:16 PM
And, we will also loose the support of organizations like competeamerica and AILA for good. Expect them to fully ignore is from that point on.
i totally understand the zeal for some action - I am in the same boat after all. If IV as an organization collectively determines that it is in our best interests to selectively side with the devil, I am all for it. Let the core team decide what is best for us.
AILA and competeamerica will not be against a fair reform of the H1B, as long as they see increased numbers. Now, let the core team express its opinion.
i totally understand the zeal for some action - I am in the same boat after all. If IV as an organization collectively determines that it is in our best interests to selectively side with the devil, I am all for it. Let the core team decide what is best for us.
AILA and competeamerica will not be against a fair reform of the H1B, as long as they see increased numbers. Now, let the core team express its opinion.
more...
waitnwatch
12-12 03:03 PM
Agree with the underfunded and overloaded part. But tell me, how come EB2 India became unavailable and then available again? I fear that USCIS is not at all fair when it comes to moving dates. If dates are moved, they will have to deal with so many new applications from ppl whose PDs became current. That may be the only reason to not move dates. In the last bulletin, they did not say anything about high demand for EB2 India, and now they do. Setting up of the cut-off dates is done entirely on the basis of a "forecast" which can be very subjective.
Maybe it's just my frustration today, and USCIS is not being unfair....
Here's how I understand the unavailable versus available part. The years quota is released evenly through quarters and unavailability happens in the last quarter of the year when a particular country has taken up its 7% for that category. I would assume the USCIS also divides the quarterly quota so that the backlogged countries take up 7% each of that quota. Of course they don't say "unavailable" until the last quarter as technically until they reach that quarter there are numbers left for those countries.
This is a layman explanation which may be utterly wrong and I defer to the experts....
Maybe it's just my frustration today, and USCIS is not being unfair....
Here's how I understand the unavailable versus available part. The years quota is released evenly through quarters and unavailability happens in the last quarter of the year when a particular country has taken up its 7% for that category. I would assume the USCIS also divides the quarterly quota so that the backlogged countries take up 7% each of that quota. Of course they don't say "unavailable" until the last quarter as technically until they reach that quarter there are numbers left for those countries.
This is a layman explanation which may be utterly wrong and I defer to the experts....
hair Eva Mendes updo hairstyle
indianabacklog
03-31 04:14 PM
How many people have viewed this and simply ignore the plight of these children who are left out in the cold?
Anyone viewing this thread please take a couple of minutes of your time to call your senator and ask that the least we can ask is that they get included in the DREAM act. It is not a lot to ask of you all and certainly not a lot to ask that those who followed the rules get the same chance as those who did not.
If enough people call then maybe somebody will hear us.
Anyone viewing this thread please take a couple of minutes of your time to call your senator and ask that the least we can ask is that they get included in the DREAM act. It is not a lot to ask of you all and certainly not a lot to ask that those who followed the rules get the same chance as those who did not.
If enough people call then maybe somebody will hear us.
more...
Munshi75
12-26 12:04 AM
Even after running the post for over a month, the response has not even been moderate, Wake up guys, let us pull it together. I am from NJ and if anyone is interested , let us get together and wake all those "EAD's UP!!!!.
hot celebrity updo hairstyles
qtoask
07-08 02:49 PM
I guess, Its safe to believe around 250 People are already sent the flowers...
Now is the time to get media attention...
post it in Yahoo, google...etc....
Now is the time to get media attention...
post it in Yahoo, google...etc....
more...
house wedding hairstyles for short
for_gc
09-08 12:25 PM
Pappu,
How do we add this info in the IV tracker ?
How do we add this info in the IV tracker ?
tattoo celebrity updo hairstyles
sammyb
07-10 07:06 PM
What the USCIS said was "asx cbdgy jsdy6 sjdj34 dere3 dfdfrf4 saddfsfef4 aasd 3445 affwwdwe 43 de34556 adsddw2 dwr343 dewddff 33rsdwer3 sdwdewd3"
Sorry its in "donors only lingo":D
IV will repel genuine people ....
I am not interested to be a donor and will contribute based on action plan as I did before and did contribute a good amount of money to IV - but what I hate to see is people like you - being a donor you think you got the right to insult non-donors ....
the way IV forums are being used, very soon I may run out of option but to disassociate myself with it... Its sad but that is the fact ...
Sorry its in "donors only lingo":D
IV will repel genuine people ....
I am not interested to be a donor and will contribute based on action plan as I did before and did contribute a good amount of money to IV - but what I hate to see is people like you - being a donor you think you got the right to insult non-donors ....
the way IV forums are being used, very soon I may run out of option but to disassociate myself with it... Its sad but that is the fact ...
more...
pictures Keeping up with celebrities
imh1b
11-17 12:07 PM
I saw your posts on other forums when i was posting about these...hmm I will PM you do you have right email linked to it ? please fill in your profile...
The dude never even defended or promoted IV on the other forums. Spends all time there to track. Such people should not be helped. When the other website deletes posts about a campaign that helps everyone, why nobody is complaining? Let them suffer.
The dude never even defended or promoted IV on the other forums. Spends all time there to track. Such people should not be helped. When the other website deletes posts about a campaign that helps everyone, why nobody is complaining? Let them suffer.
dresses nice celebrity Updo Hairstyles
Ramba
06-13 06:14 PM
I feel that this is idea of USCIS for this action.
There are so many 485s pending and ready for approval. The composition of PDs of these 485s vary from 2001 to 2006. These 485s belongs mainly fom applicants from India and China, not many ROW. The number of visas available is far more than already pending 485s. Unless they make it to 2006, the visas will get wasted. Even if they recive new 485s with old PD, it can not be approved before sep 2007.
Therefore, now, they are forced to make all catagory current, so that all the 485s that were filed already and pending for long time get cleared. Also, If they make all catagory current, they will recvie all the 485s even with very new PD 2007. Then they can do home work, to estimate the demand in each catagory, accordingly they can retrogress the date in September for FY 2008.
Therefore it is a win-win situation for all. By doing so, USCIS has helped to meet one of the IV objective, filing 485 w/o visas number.
There are so many 485s pending and ready for approval. The composition of PDs of these 485s vary from 2001 to 2006. These 485s belongs mainly fom applicants from India and China, not many ROW. The number of visas available is far more than already pending 485s. Unless they make it to 2006, the visas will get wasted. Even if they recive new 485s with old PD, it can not be approved before sep 2007.
Therefore, now, they are forced to make all catagory current, so that all the 485s that were filed already and pending for long time get cleared. Also, If they make all catagory current, they will recvie all the 485s even with very new PD 2007. Then they can do home work, to estimate the demand in each catagory, accordingly they can retrogress the date in September for FY 2008.
Therefore it is a win-win situation for all. By doing so, USCIS has helped to meet one of the IV objective, filing 485 w/o visas number.
more...
makeup celebrity updo hairstyles 2011. Celebrity Hairstyles Updos
ckct
06-15 07:54 AM
I just got mine done for $160 per person in CT....
Hi tnite,
Can you please give me the doctor's name?
thanks
ck
Hi tnite,
Can you please give me the doctor's name?
thanks
ck
girlfriend Celebrity updo hairstyle
Edison99
08-10 09:43 AM
Who cares Competitiveness?
Well said ! This is a political game in which the real loser is American Competitiveness.
Well said ! This is a political game in which the real loser is American Competitiveness.
hairstyles celebrity up do hairstyles.
bigboy007
10-29 03:11 PM
10 out of 28 and counting... Guys Respond... These will help us all we are running out of time... Collective we are...
When i contacted USCIS Immigration Officer ( not the customer rep) they acknowledged delays and said it may go through middle of November unless we seek highlights from higher officials to print our cards at a different center or get an urgent fix we are going no where... Once I send this info to IV Core WINDOW IS CLOSED on this topic./..
When i contacted USCIS Immigration Officer ( not the customer rep) they acknowledged delays and said it may go through middle of November unless we seek highlights from higher officials to print our cards at a different center or get an urgent fix we are going no where... Once I send this info to IV Core WINDOW IS CLOSED on this topic./..
gc_maine2
07-30 04:26 PM
Finished calling all, it took less than 15 min. Only three rep's asked me my name & zip. Rest all said they will pass the message. so please call this our chance, they are all very friendly.
Hewa
09-26 02:12 PM
There is definitely something wrong with the FOIA data.
The data from FOIA says "Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Oct, 2009" (with and without spillover) :D. But, the Oct 09 Visa Bulletin says my PD is nowhere near to being current.
The website data calculator says "Jan 2011" without spillover, which is more believable.
The data from FOIA says "Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Oct, 2009" (with and without spillover) :D. But, the Oct 09 Visa Bulletin says my PD is nowhere near to being current.
The website data calculator says "Jan 2011" without spillover, which is more believable.
No comments:
Post a Comment